The 2026 Annual Report on People with Disabilities in America shows statistics on the most important topics about people with disabilities. We know these are the most important topics because of a large study done in 2008 by the National Council on Disability. The National Council on Disability chose these topics by asking many people what they thought were the most important things to know about people with disabilities. People said that jobs, education, health, money, free time, relationships, and safety are the most important topics to know about.
This year, we have created an online version of the 2026 Annual Report on People with Disabilities in America that you can browse through below.
Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics
Institute on Disability
University of New Hampshire
A NIDILRR-Funded Center
Annual Report on People with Disabilities in America: 2026
Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability
Statistics and Demographics
Copyright 2026. Institute on Disability. University of New Hampshire. Published in 2026 by The Center for Research on Disability
University of New Hampshire
College of Health and Human Services, Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824-3593
iod.unh.edu
(603) 862-4320 | Relay: 711
researchondisability.org
(866) 538-9521
Printed in the USA
First Printing, 2026
Designed by Bianca Weatherly
Authors: Andrew J. Houtenville, PhD, Director, Institute on Disability, Stacia Kingsbury, MPP, Project Research Specialist, Institute on Disability, Nate Thomas, MS, Research Data Scientist, Institute on Disability
This document is available in alternative formats upon request.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to the following individuals who have contributed to the success of this effort: Amy Chamberlain, Romy Eberle, Kate Filanoski-Russell, Megan Henly, Hyun Ju Kim, Xueting Sun, Kartik Trivedi, and Karen Volle. Funding for this publication was made possible by: The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community, Living National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), grant number 90RTGE0005. The information developed by the StatsRRTC does not necessarily represent the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government (Edgar, 75.620 (b)).
The StatsRRTC is part of the Institute on Disability (IOD) at the University of New Hampshire (UNH). The Institute on Disability was established in 1987 to provide a university-based focus for the improvement of knowledge, policies, and practices related to the lives of people with disabilities and their families and is New Hampshire’s University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Education, Research, and Service (UCEDD). Located within the University of New Hampshire, the IOD is a federally designated center authorized by the Developmental Disabilities Act. Through innovative and interdisciplinary research, academic, service, and dissemination initiatives, the IOD builds local, state, and national capacities to respond to the needs of individuals with disabilities and their families.
Introduction
Make the call.
Statistics are numbers that can show us how something has changed over time or how something could change in the future. For example, the National Bureau of Economic Research looks at the national gross domestic product, which tells us how much money the country makes. The Bureau of Labor Statistics checks how many people are or are not working. Every September, the U.S. Census Bureau tells us how many poor people there are and if that number went up or down since the year before. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Healthy People program reviews health data every ten years. The Annual Report on People with Disabilities in America (Annual Report) tracks the progress of important social and economic topics to see if things are getting better or worse for people with disabilities. The Annual Report shows statistics on the most important topics about people with disabilities. We know these are the most important topics because of a large study done in 2008 by the National Council on Disability. The National Council on Disability chose these topics by asking many people what they thought were the most important things to know about people with disabilities. People said things like jobs, education, health, money, free time, relationships, and safety are the most important topics to know about.
The statistics in this report are from the American Community Survey (ACS), a national survey done by the U.S. Census Bureau every year. It asks people about disability, employment, education, and other topics. We used ACS Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) to estimate the numbers in this report. We made sure our estimates represent the whole country by using sampling weights. We report all these statistics from 2008 to the most recent data year (this year 2024) in a table and on a line chart. Then, we do mathematical tests to see if the statistics for these topics are getting better or worse for people with disabilities. To Make the Call, we report the gap between results for people with and without disabilities for the year, and we also compare this year’s results for people with disabilities to last year’s results for people with disabilities and report statistical significance. These tests tell us if the numbers for each year have changed a lot (either increasing or decreasing) or if they have not changed much at all. It is good to know that not all statistically significant results are meaningful to the social or political discussion happening right now, and we may need more information to understand how they can be used. We also include standard error on each table to show how certain the estimates are. See the Glossary for definitions.
Expanded Discussion
Topics
The Annual Report on People with Disabilities in America (Annual Report) includes many of the key indicators identified in a comprehensive 2008 study, Keeping Track: National Disability Status and Program Performance Indicators1, conducted by the National Council on Disability (NCD). This NCD report used a systematic approach of stakeholder input to select indicators based on data availability and ability to address key areas of interest. The resulting topical indicators were in the following areas of interest: employment, educational attainment, health and health care, financial status and security, leisure recreation, personal relationships, and crime/safety. The Annual Report tracks statistics on these topics indicate how life for people with disabilities has changed over time. For this reason, we refer to these topics as indicators.
Methods
The current set of indicators is derived from the American Community Survey (ACS), from 2008 to 2024 (the most recent year of available data). As other data sources become available, we may use those to examine other NCD indicators of interest. The ACS is an annual survey conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau and is well-suited to track these indicators over time due to its large sample size, consistent questionnaire over the years, and multitude of variables. The ACS Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) files, which allow data users to conduct customized analyses, were used to estimate the statistics enclosed. Sample weights and replicate sample weights were used to produce nationally representative statistics that account for sample design effects. Statistical significance is based on a one-tail test using a 95 percent level of confidence. Some of the tables produced here have slightly different results from those published in the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium. The Annual Report includes people living in institutions whereas the Compendium does not include people living in institutions. This year, results are presented with varying number of decimal places. The number of decimal placements is related to the precision of the measurement. Some are more precise (meaning more decimal places) because the groups are larger.
Making Calls
How did the lives of people with disabilities change from 2023 to 2024? The statistics show mixed results, according to the narrowing or widening of the “gaps” in key indicators between people with and without disabilities. “Calls” can be made for each of the indicators. In cases where we are certain (with at least 95 percent confidence) that a given gap exists, we consider that gap to be statistically significant. Comparisons are reported on the year over year changes for people with disabilities – whether the changes are positive or negative and any statistical significance (with at least 95 percent confidence). It is also important to note that understanding how statistical significance can be applied requires context. Whether the magnitude of any gap is meaningful from a social or policy perspective is a matter for further discussion. Please refer to the Glossary for definitions of technical terms
Suggested Citation
Houtenville, A., Kingsbury, S., Thomas, N. (2026). Annual Report on People with Disabilities in America: 2026. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability.
Reference
- National Council on Disability. (2008). Keeping Track: National Disability Status and Program Performance Indicators. National Council on Disability. https://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED503702.pdf
COVID-19 and Data Collection
The COVID-19 Pandemic impacted the collection of ACS data in 2020. As a result, statistical tests comparing estimates from 2020 to any other year are less reliable. To explain, the ACS uses a mix of internet, mail, telephone, and in-person interviews to collect data. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, data collection activities were interrupted. In-person interviewing ceased on March 20, 2020, and only internet and telephone interviewing continued through the end of June 2020. In July and August 2020, limited in-person interviewing resumed in certain geographic areas, expanding throughout the year. However, the ACS resumed pre-COVID in-person interviewing coverage in February 2021. Mailings were also limited due to a decrease in federal staff and resources during this same period. This impacted not only mail data collection but also telephone response rates due to the lack of pre-notice mailings typically sent in advance of first contact. These challenges to data collection prompted the U.S. Census Bureau to assess the 2020 ACS 1-year for new biases (i.e., differences from previous years) because of nonresponse and coverage and examined data quality issues associated with low sample sizes high and high item non-response rates. This yielded corresponding bias in some point estimates and lower reliability of estimates. Instead of releasing the standard ACS 1-year estimates, U.S. Census Bureau-issued experimental weights which, when applied, provide the best estimates for 2020 at the national and state level. Data users should not interpret substantial differences from 2020 estimates as evidence of a trend or statistically significant difference. Estimates using the experimental weights are generally considered the best possible estimates of U.S. population statistics for 2020, however, these comparisons are less reliable than estimates for other years. Due to the variance properties of the experimental estimation methodology, the standard error estimates for some estimates may be smaller than expected when compared to the equivalent variance estimates from previous years. (Visit the Census Bureau for more information on experimental weights: www. census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data/experimental-data/2020-1- year-pums.html).
Additional Resources
This report complements the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium and infographics located online at www.researchondisability.org/ annual-disability-statistics-collection. For reasons discussed in Methods, the statistics reported in the Annual Report might differ from those reported in the Annual Disability Statistics Compendium. Help navigating any of the resources described here can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions section at www.researchondisability.org/frequently-asked-questions. Assistance interpreting and locating additional statistics is available by email at www.disability.statistics@unh.edu. Please visit the Center for Research on Disability online at www.researchondisability. org for more information about our research projects.
Population Size
This section shows that in 2024, there were 338,845,000 people of all ages living in the United States. Of this group, 47,908,000 were people with disabilities. In other words, people with disabilities made up 14.14% of the US population. Refer to the Appendix to view the ACS disability questions used for these estimates.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using the 2008-2024 ACS for civilian respondents of all ages.
Table 1. Number and Percentage of People with Disabilities
| Year | Total Population Estimate (#) | Population with Disabilities Estimate (#) | Percent with Disabilities: Estimate (%) | Percent with Disabilities: St. Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||
| 2009 | ||||
| 2010 | ||||
| 2011 | ||||
| 2012 | ||||
| 2013 | ||||
| 2014 | ||||
| 2015 | ||||
| 2016 | ||||
| 2017 | ||||
| 2018 | ||||
| 2019 | ||||
| 2020 | ||||
| 2021 | ||||
| 2022 | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||
Figure 1. Percentage of People with Disabilities
The Call
The percentage of civiliancs with disabilities increased from 14.04 percent in 2023 to 14.14 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Did the percentage of the population with disabilities significantly change between 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant increased in the percentage of people with disabilities in the United States from 14.04 percent in 2023 to 14.14 percent in 2024.
Disabiling Environments
This section analyzes the number and percentage of civilians ages 18 to 64 who live in the community, have hearing, vision, ambulatory, and/ or cognitive disability and also have an independent living disability. People could have difficulty living independently because their community is not accessible (or set up so people with disabilities cannot get around by themselves when they want). These estimates help us think about what is working and what can improve to help people live more independently. Refer to the Glossary for definitions on the Disabling Environments Index and Disability.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using the 2008-2024 ACS for civilian respondents with hearing, vision, ambulatory, and/ or cognitive disabilities, ages 18- 64, living in community settings.
Table 2. Disabling Environments Index
| Year | Total Estimate (#) | Independent Living Disability: Estimate (#) | Disabling Environment Index (with Independent Living Disability): Estimate (%) | Disabling Environment Index (with Independent Living Disability): St. Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||
| 2009 | ||||
| 2010 | ||||
| 2011 | ||||
| 2012 | ||||
| 2013 | ||||
| 2014 | ||||
| 2015 | ||||
| 2016 | ||||
| 2017 | ||||
| 2018 | ||||
| 2019 | ||||
| 2020 | ||||
| 2021 | ||||
| 2022 | ||||
| 2023 | ||||
| 2024 | ||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||
Figure 2. Disabling Environments Index
The Call
While not a gap, but an indicator of local community accessibility, the Disability Environments Index increased from 32.32 percent in 2023 to 32.65 percent in 2024.
The Index is the percentage of civilians ages 18-64 who live in community settings with hearing, vision, ambulatory, and/or cognitive disabilities who report an independent living disability (i.e., difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping).
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Did the Disabling Environments Index significantly change between 2023 and 2024? In other words, has local area accessibility significantly improved or worsened from 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant increase in the Disabling Environments Index in the United States from 32.32 percent in 2023 to 32.65 percent in 2024. Accessibility in local areas significantly worsened.
Living in Institutions
This section estimates the number and percentage of civilians ages 64 and younger in the U.S. who live in institutional group quarters. Institutional group quarters include places like correctional facilities and mental health treatment centers.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using the 2008-2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 64 and younger.
Table 3. Living in Institutional Group Quarters (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 3. Percentage Living in Institutional Group Quarters
The Call
The gap in the “percentage of living in institutional group quarters” between people (civilians ages zero to 64) with and without disabilities narrowed from 2.513 percent in 2023 to 2.407 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Did the percentage of the population with disabilities who live in institutions significantly change between 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant decrease in the rate of institutionalization of people with disabilites (civialians ages zero to 64) from 3.068 percent in 2023 to 2.965 percent in 2024.
Education
Less than High School
This section estimates the number and percentage of civilians ages 25 to 34 in the U.S. living in the community with less than a high school education.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 25-34 living in community settings.
Table 4. Less than a High School Diploma (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 4. Percentage with Less than a High School Education
The Call
The gap in the “percentage not attaining a high school diploma or equivalent” between people (civilians ages 25 to 34 living in the community) with and without disabilities narrowed from 5.5 percent in 2023 to 5.47 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Did the percentage of the population with disabilities who attained less than a high school education significantly change between 2023 and 2024?
No.
There was not a statistically significant change in the rate people with disabilities attaining less than a high school education (civialians ages 25 to 34) from 11.844 percent in 2023 to 11.83 percent in 2024. No difference was detected between 2023 and 2024.
Education
Bachelor’s Degree or Higher
This section estimates the number and percentage of civilians ages 25 to 34 in the U.S. living in the community with achieved a bachelor’s degree or higher. See the Glossary to learn how this was defined.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 25-34 living in community settings.
Table 5. Bachelor’s Degree or Higher (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 5. Percentage with a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher
The Call
The gap in the “percentage attaining a bachelor’s degree or higher” between people (civilians ages 25 to 34 living in the community) with and without disabilities narrowed from -20.39 percent in 2023 to -19.58 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Did the percentage of the population with disabilities who attained bachelor’s degree or higher significantly change between 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant increase in the rate people with disabilities attaining a bachelor’s degree or higher (civialians ages 25 to 34) from 22.235 percent in 2023 to 23.646 percent in 2024.
Employment
This section estimates employment to population ratios for civilians with and without disabilities ages 18 to 64 in the U.S. living in the community. See the Glossary for information about the Employment to Population Ratio.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 18-64 living in community settings.
Table 6. Employment-to-Population Ratio (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 6. Employment-to-Population Ratio
The Call
The gap in the “employment-to-population ratio” between people (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) with and without disabilities narrowed from -33.19 percent in 2023 to -33.15 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Did employment rates of the population with disabilities significantly change between 2023 and 2024?
No.
There was not a statistically significant change in the employment rate people with disabilities (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) from 46.257 percent in 2023 to 46.454 percent in 2024. No difference was detected between 2023 and 2024.
Earnings from Work
This section shows the median earnings of full-time, full-year workers with and without disabilities ages 18-64 in the US living in the community.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 18-64 who live in the community and work fulltime, full-year. Dollar amounts are inflation-adjusted to 2024 dollars using the Consumer Price Index
Table 7. Median Earnings of Full-Time, Full-Year Workers ($)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 7. Median Earnings of Full-Time, (thousands, 2024 dollars)
The Call
The gap in the “median earnings from work” between people (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community and working full-time, full-year) with and without disabilities widened from -$9,446 in 2023 to -$10,152 in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Did earnings of the population with disabilities significantly change between 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant increase in the earnings of people with disabilities (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community and working full-time, full-year) from $50,380 in 2023 to $50,762 in 2024.
Poverty
This section shows the poverty rates of people with and without disabilities ages 18-64 in the US living in the community. Poverty is defined as living at the 100% Federal Poverty Level or below. See the Glossary for definitions.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 18-64 living in community settings.
Table 8. Poverty Rate (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 8. Poverty Rate
The Call
The gap in the “poverty rate” between people (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) with and without disabilities narrowed from 13.87 percent in 2023 to 13.67 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Did percentage of the population with disabilities experiencing poverty significantly change between 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of people with disabilities experiencing poverty (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) from 25.299 percent in 2023 to 24.812 percent in 2024.
Health Insurance
This section shows health insurance coverage rates for people with and without disabilities ages 18-64 in the US living in the community. These numbers include both public and private types of health insurance. See the Glossary for definitions of public and private health insurance.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 18-64 living in community settings.
Table 9. Health Insurance Coverage (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 9. Percentage with Health Insurance Coverage
The Call
The gap in the “percentage with health insurance” between people (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) with and without disabilities narrowed from 2.09 percent in 2023 to 1.87 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Was there a significant change in health insurance coverage rates for people with disabilities between 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant decrease in health insurance coverage of any type for people with disabilities (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) from 90.928 percent in 2023 to 90.444 percent in 2024.
Private Health Insurance
This section shows the private health insurance coverage rates of people with and without disabilities ages 18-64 in the US living in the community.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 18-64 living in community settings.
Table 10. Private Health Insurance Coverage (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 10. Percentage with Private Health Insurance Coverage
The Call
The gap in the “percentage with private health insurance” between people (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) with and without disabilities narrowed from -25.94 percent in 2023 to -25.41 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Was there a significant change in private health insurance coverage rates for people with disabilities between 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant increase in private health insurance coverage of any type for people with disabilities (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) from 50.356 percent in 2023 to 51.181 percent in 2024.
Mass Trasit to Work
This section shows the percentages of people with and without disabilities ages 18-64 in the US living in the community who use public (or mass) transportation to get to their workplaces.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 18-64 living in community settings.
Table 11. Mass Transit to Work (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 11. Percentage of Workers Using Mass Transit to Work
The Call
The gap in the “percentage of workers using mass trasnporation to work” between people (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) with and without disabilities narrowed from 0.36 percent in 2023 to 0.3 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Was there a significant change in private health insurance coverage rates for people with disabilities between 2023 and 2024?
No.
There was not a statistically significant change in percentage of people with disabilities (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) taking masss transit to work from 3.887 percent in 2023 to 3.997 percent in 2024. No difference was detected between 2023 and 2024.
Age of Home (1990+)
This section shows the percentages of people with and without disabilities ages 64 and younger, living in community settings who have homes that were built between 1990 and 2024.
Source:
Authors’ estimates using 2008- 2024 ACS data for civilian respondents ages 18-64 living in community settings.
Table 12. Home Constructed 1990 or More Recent (%)
| Year | People with Disabilities Estimate | People with Disabilities (St. Error) | People without Disabilities Estimate | People without Disabilities (St. Error) | Gap (%pts) Estimate | Gap (%pts) St. Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ||||||
| 2009 | ||||||
| 2010 | ||||||
| 2011 | ||||||
| 2012 | ||||||
| 2013 | ||||||
| 2014 | ||||||
| 2015 | ||||||
| 2016 | ||||||
| 2017 | ||||||
| 2018 | ||||||
| 2019 | ||||||
| 2020 | ||||||
| 2021 | ||||||
| 2022 | ||||||
| 2023 | ||||||
| 2024 | ||||||
| * Significant at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| † Significantly different from the previous year at the 95 percent confidence level using a one tailed test. | ||||||
| ‡ Significantly different from 2024 at the 95 percent confidence using a one tailed test. | ||||||
Figure 12. Percentage of Workers Using Mass Transit to Work
The Call
The gap in the “percentage living in homes built in 1990 or more recent” between people (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) with and without disabilities narrowed from -7.02 percent in 2023 to -6.68 percent in 2024.
Comparison and Statistical Significance
Was there a significant change in the rate of people with disabilities living in homes built in 1990 to present between 2023 and 2024?
Yes.
There was a statistically significant increase in rate of people with disabilities (civilians 18-64 years old living in the community) living in newer homes from 34.791 percent in 2023 to 35.733 percent in 2024.
Appendix
American Comunity Survey: Six Disability Questions
The six disability questions in the American Community Survey (ACS) are listed below as they appear in the 2023 English language questionnaire:
18. Answer question 17a if this person is covered by health insurance. Otherwise, SKIP to question 18a.
18a. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? [yes or no]
18b. Is this person blind, or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses? [yes or no]
19. Answer questions 19a–c if this person is 5 years old or over. Otherwise, SKIP to the questions for Person 2 on page 19
19a. Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions? [yes or no]
19b. Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs? [yes or no]
19c. Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing? [yes or no]
20. Answer question 20 if this person is 15 years old or over. Otherwise, SKIP to the questions for Person 2 on page 19.
20. Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping? [yes or no]
Glossary
American Community Survey (ACS)
The American Community Survey (ACS) is a big survey done by the US Census Bureau every year. It gives accurate info about communities in the US. The survey creates yearly and multiyear estimates of population and housing data for small areas. This includes specific neighborhoods and groups of people. They collect this info by sending questionnaires by mail to some addresses. You can find more details on the Census Bureau website.
Bachelor’s Degree or Higher
When we say a person has attained a bachelor’s degree or higher, it means if they have earned a bachelor’s degree (such as: BA and BS), master’s degree (such as: MA, MS, MEng, MEd, MSW, MBA), an advanced professional degree (such as: MD, DDS, DVM, LLB, JD), and/or doctorate degree (such as: PhD, EdD).
Civilian
A person who is not in active-duty military. This includes individuals who are civilians, veterans (those who have completed their activeduty status), and reservists or National Guard members who are not currently activated for active duty.
Disability
In the ACS, the Census Bureau used responses to six questions to identify whether a person has a disability. These questions ask about difficulties related to vision, hearing, cognition, ambulation, selfcare, and independent living (see Appendix for the wording of these six questions). A person is considered as having a disability if they answer “yes” to having one or more of these difficulties.
Disabling Environments Index
The environment plays a role in what’s known as the “enablement/ disablement process”. For example, being blind or having serious difficulty seeing (even with glasses) can be more challenging in areas without local mass transit. We created the “Disabling Environment Index” to better understand this. This index gives a snapshot of how disabling one’s local environment is. This index focuses on people with independent living disabilities (i.e., difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office of shopping, due to a disabling physical, mental, or emotional condition) who also have a hearing, vision, ambulatory, and/or cognitive disability.
Earnings
The term “earnings” means the money you get from jobs like wages, salary, commissions, bonuses, or tips, before any deductions are made. Deductions can include taxes, bonds, dues, or other expenses. Your earnings are reported every year for the last 12 months. The ACS takes place all year to collect information on various aspects of communities and households.
Employment/Employment Status
People were asked many questions designed to determine their employment status. Based on the answers, individuals were classified into one of five groups:
Those who worked at any time during the past week.
People who were temporarily not working but were ready to work if needed.
People who did not work during the past week but who had jobs or businesses they were temporarily away from (not including layoffs).
People who did not work last week, but who were actively trying to find a job in the last four weeks and were ready for work if needed.
People not in the labor force (didn’t have any job and were not looking for a job).
Full-Time, Full-Year
A person is called a full-time, full-year worker, if they worked 35 hours or more per week for 50 to 52 weeks in the last 12 months.
Gap
A gap is the difference between the numbers for two groups. For example, it could be the difference in the percentage of people employed for those with disabilities and those without disabilities.
Health Insurance Coverage
In the American Community Survey health insurance includes both private plans and public coverage. To understand how many people are covered and the types of insurance(s) people may have, respondents are asked to mark “yes” or “no” for the following eight types of insurance listed:
Insurance from current or former employer or union (either for themselves or another family member);
Insurance bought directly from an insurance company (either by themselves or another family member);
Medicare, for people 65 and older, or people with certain disabilities;
Medicaid, Medical Assistance, or any government-assistance plan for those with low incomes or a disability;
TRICARE or other military health care;
VA (including those who have ever used or enrolled for VA health care;
Indian Health Service; and/or
Any other type of health insurance or health coverage plan.
Income
The ACS asks about income in eight different ways:
Money from jobs like wages, salary, commissions, bonuses, or tips from all jobs (before deductions for taxes, bonds, dues, or other items).
Money earned from running your own business (after taking out business expenses).
Money from things like interest, dividends, rental income, royalties, or income from estates and trusts.
Social Security or Railroad Retirement income.
Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
Any help from the government or the state or local welfare office.
Money from retirement, survivors, or disability pensions (not including Social Security).
Other regular income like Veterans’ (VA) payments, unemployment compensation, child support or alimony. Adding up all types of income for everyone in the household helps determine if the family is experiencing poverty. “Poverty” is in the glossary.
Less than a High School Diploma
A person has “less than a high school education” if they have not finished high school and haven’t gotten a high school diploma, General Equivalency Degree (GED), or alternative credential.
Living in the Community
A person lives in the community if they are not living in places like prisons, nursing homes, or hospitals. If a person lives in a college dormitory they are living in the community.
No Difference Detected
“No difference detected” means that we couldn’t find a significant change in the numbers between two different years. It’s like saying, when we compared the employment gaps in 2017 and 2013, the numbers were so close that we can’t be sure there’s a real difference. We use a 95 percent chance as a threshold – if there’s less than that chance, we say there’s no significant difference. So, in Table 2, the employment gaps in 2017 (41.0% pts) and 2013 (40.9% pts) were so similar that we can’t confidently say there’s a change based on the data.
Noninstitutionalized Population
This means people who live in the community and not places like jails, prisons, nursing homes, hospitals, etc. People who live in college dormitories are considered as living in the community.
Population Size
The total number of people (including everyone from different races, classes, and groups) in a specific area.
Poverty
The Office of Management and Budget in Statistical Policy, Directive 14 makes income thresholds, called poverty lines, based on the prices of a standard set of goods and services that families need. Different income thresholds are created based on family size and age of people (like the number of people under age 18 or the number of people over age 65 and older). In the ACS, details about income, family size, and age are used to figure out if someone’s family income is below the poverty line. “Income” is defined in the glossary.
Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) Files
The ACS PUMS files have information about households and individuals. The files include responses to the ACS questionnaire and other variables (such as sample weights). Data are edited to keep sensitive information private to protect respondents’ identities.
Sampling Error
Sampling error occurs when a statistic is estimated using a sample (a group of people) rather than the whole population (everyone). A sampling error creates variation in statistics that are calculated by using a sample.
Standard Error
The standard error of a statistic shows how much variation there is in the data that is used to estimate the statistic. It tells us how uncertain, or spread out, a statistic may be, given the current information. Usually, standard error gets smaller when we have more people in the sample and when there’s less difference in what we’re measuring.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is when researchers can say they have discovered something real or significant is happening that isn’t by chance, and it falls within a certain threshold, such as five percent. In Table 2 the employment gap in 2017 is statistically significant. This means, based on the data, there’s less than a five percent chance of being wrong when we say there is a significant difference in the employment rates between people with and without disabilities. In simpler terms, we are 95 percent or more confident that we found a gap in the employment rates of these two groups.
About the Center
Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC)
Policymakers, program administrators, service providers, researchers, advocates for people with disabilities, and people with disabilities and their families need accessible, valid data/statistics to support their decisions related to policy improvements, program administration, service delivery, protection of civil rights, and major life activities. The StatsRRTC supports a variety of integrated research and outreach activities by (a) improving knowledge about and access to existing data, (b) generating the knowledge needed to improve future disability data collection, and (c) strengthening connections between the data from and regarding respondents, researchers, and decision-makers. In this way, the StatsRRTC supports the improvement of service systems that advance the quality of life for people with disabilities.
The StatsRRTC is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research under grant number 90RTGE0005, from 2023–2028.
Contact
University of New Hampshire
Institute on Disability
10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101
Durham, NH 03824
866.538.9521
researchondisability.org